Jump to content

User talk:Jon Kolbert/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Submissions for The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third anniversary. You are receiving this message because you participated in previous years of the challenge but have not yet submitted any article improvements for this year. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved, ensuring that all submissions are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors in November.


You may use the above button to submit entries, or go the challenge page at WP:CAN10K for more information. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Reidgreg (talk) and WP:CAN10K, 21:03, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Why am I blocked?

Hi Jon Kolbert. On Wikimedia Commons talk page of you I asked you a question but it may be that you did not see it. When I use VPN and want to edit a page I get the blocked message. I am logged in with my user name. When I switch off the VPN there is no message. Why? And why is there not any answer from you to all the other similar questions in meta.wikimedia? I have this in Commons and also in Wikipedia. Regards, Wouterhagens (talk) 13:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

@Wouterhagens: Please request a global IP block exemption on metawiki here. VPNs and proxies are regularly blocked both on a local and global level as per policy. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Ditto for me. Why do you block Psiphon VPN?: You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia Reason for the block Unknown reason Blocked by Jon Kolbert OK Details


Unblock me/IP range.

Zezen (talk) 18:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@Zezen: Please request a global IP block exemption on metawiki here. VPNs and proxies are regularly blocked both on a local and global level as per policy. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

hello

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_Iran

Hello. We need your bot for this topic. Thanks Hamidmsi (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Hi Hamidmsi!
I noticed that you posted the exact same question on the talk page of ClueBot NG's operator.
You can't request that bots like these run on articles. The bots do very specific tasks and don't deviate from them. For example, ClueBot NG is an anti-vandal bot so therefore reverts vandalism it finds. KolbertBot converts HTTP links to HTTPS and removes referral data from URLs. If this work is required on the article, the bot will get to it in time. You could also fix it yourself.-- 5 albert square (talk) 19:04, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Unblock me Please

Hey dear you have blocked me. I request you to unblock me as I want to Express my feelings and share my knowledge on Wikipedia. Gurnimrat Singh Dhaliwal (talk) 07:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@Gurnimrat Singh Dhaliwal: Please request a global IP block exemption on metawiki here. VPNs and proxies are regularly blocked both on a local and global level as per policy. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

IP block

Hello.

When I used the company network to log in to the wiki, I found that:

You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia.

Editing from your IP address range (203.205.128.0/19) has been blocked (disabled) on all Wikimedia wikis until 22:51, 26 April 2021 by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org) for the following reason:

Open Proxy: Colocation webhost - Contact stewards if you are affected

This block began on 22:51, 26 October 2019

I come from China, I need the VPN to edit wiki. I hope that you can unblockingn the IP. Thank you.--陳寅恪 (talk) 16:52, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

@陳寅恪: Please request a global IP block exemption on metawiki here. VPNs and proxies are regularly blocked both on a local and global level as per policy. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello Jon Kolbert,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 803 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools
  • It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
  • It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes
  • Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
  • Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

?

Are you ok? --- Coffeeandcrumbs 16:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Yes. I’ve confirmed off-wiki the account is secure. It was a misclick. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at m:SRG

 You are invited to join the discussion at m:SRG. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Block this IP

Hello Jon Kolbert, can you block this IP range 123.136.0.0/16 to all wikis indefinitely because this IP has made long-term abuse here. Thanks.-Fandi89 (talk) 06:20, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 Rosguill (talk) 47,395 Patrol Page Curation
2 Onel5969 (talk) 41,883 Patrol Page Curation
3 JTtheOG (talk) 11,493 Patrol Page Curation
4 Arthistorian1977 (talk) 5,562 Patrol Page Curation
5 DannyS712 (talk) 4,866 Patrol Page Curation
6 CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 3,995 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 3,812 Patrol Page Curation
8 Boleyn (talk) 3,655 Patrol Page Curation
9 Ymblanter (talk) 3,553 Patrol Page Curation
10 Cwmhiraeth (talk) 3,522 Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはJon Kolbertたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Colbert!

Hello Jon Kolbert: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, TheSandDoctor Talk 08:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message
From my family to yours, I hope that you have a wonderful Christmas holiday and a Happy New Year! Say hi to Stephen for me while you're at it. --TheSandDoctor Talk 08:10, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year!


George Bellows, North River (1908), Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. 		Best wishes for a healthy and prosperous 2020.
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.
BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 13:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

h

Jdadddy (talk) 21:27, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Jon Kolbert,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Kolbertbot making articles harder to edit

Hi, concerning this edit: The empty lines between the rows of the table were there on purpose, they make it easier to edit the long table (by humans) by adding a visual break between rockets. Why does your bot remove them? --mfb (talk) 05:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

@Mfb: A few bots that use AWB/Pywikibot apply general fixes that are seen as non-controversial housekeeping measures to standardize wikitext etc. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Well, it does make editing these large tables more difficult. It's a table that changes somewhat frequently, too. --mfb (talk) 05:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Jon, thanks for your work updating CBC News articles. I noticed on Suncor Energy Centre, your edit updated not just the CBC url but also the archive.org URL. The resulting archive.org url doesn't actually exist and fortunately redirects to a valid archive (with a different archivedate), but there's no guarantee that the new URL has been archived, if it hasn't been archived then the archiveurl would be useless. I wonder if you should leave the archiveurl as-is and only fix the url= component. I updated the page in question to an archive for the new CBC URL but wanted to let you know in case the same thing happened elsewhere. Cheers, -M.Nelson (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

@M.nelson: Hey there, thanks for the note. I am aware this is occurring, and there will be a fix on the way once the bulk of the CBC links are done (there remains a few using the old format here and there). Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Another language version Wikipedia

Dear Jon, Regarding Korean-version Wikipedia space and one of the IP users below, I have noticed that the IP user"180.64.161.132" was blocked by your administrative action.

  • The IP user"180.64.161.132" provided my talk page with constructive feedback about the previous controversial administrative action.
  • Would you please let me know how would you be able to notice the user below used the Proxy IP address?

(example of my inquiry: the source of report: Have you received the report from one of the users in Korean-version Wikpedia? ) Goodtiming8871 (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

  • 180.64.161.132 AS9318 SKB-AS SK Broadband Co Ltd, KR 180.64.0.0/13 [1]
@Goodtiming8871: It is an OpenVPN proxy see here. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:43, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear Jon, Thank you for your response. I am just wondering that how would you be able to access Korean Version wikipedia as per the language barrier.
From my understanding, it might be uncommon to access different language wikipedia and especially, it's one of the users page.
I reckon that you might have received the request(report) from one of the users in Korean version-Wikipedia.
Regarding the guide about proxie-ip below:
  • They are not the intended targets and may freely use proxies until those are blocked. [2]
I thought that it might be the special case to block the IP address with a single edit count. However, the block action of the IP address could be happened, if there was a request from one of the users in Korean version-Wikipedia, Goodtiming8871 (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
@Goodtiming8871: I am not sure what you are referring to. There was no request to block it, it was discovered to be a proxy and it was subsequentially blocked. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Inquiry

Thank you for your response. I think it was a rare case to patrol the Korean version wikipedia by the English Administrator.

Have you patrolled Korean version wikipedia regularly? example of my inquiry : have you blocked another IP address previously? (except for IP users 180.64.161.132 or 36.39.9.51)
I have noticed another blocked IP address below. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 10:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
EXAMPLE: 6 of April 2020 [3]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:01, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: thank you :) Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:06, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello Jon Kolbert,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources
  • A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
  • Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
  • A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
  • Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Sportsfan 1234. I noticed that you recently removed content from Justin Trudeau without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Charles Stewart (premier)

Your edit here had the effect of designating a bunch of candidates for office as "Progressive Conservatives", despite no such party existing when they ran. I've started a discussion here regarding what we can do about that. Steve Smith (talk) 12:50, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

@Steve Smith: This pre-dated any of my edits, as shown here. Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
That version makes no mention of Progressive Conservatives, though, just Conservatives. The first mention of Progressive Conservatives was in the edit I linked, unless I'm missing something. In any event, who added it when isn't necessarily important; I'm just concerned about how to fix it, and User:Earl Andrew's providing some assistance there. Steve Smith (talk) 04:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
@Steve Smith: It's worth noting which page it links to, which is the Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

I don’t use Meta Wikipedia or do long-term abuse

I don’t do long-term abuse at all. I also don’t use the Meta wiki. Why did I get blocked? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.74.247.125 (talk) 16:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:D-MART Logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:D-MART Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

LTA

Not sure why you're a target of that WP:LTA but after multiple disruptions I protected your page for a couple days. Hope that's okay. Just let me know if you want it lowered or extended. Thanks. Glen (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

2020 BC Election Result Tables

Hello. Would you mind helping me create 2020 BC Election result tables? Look at Template:British Columbia provincial election, 2020/Richmond North Centre as a example. Thank you, stay healthy! - Eric0892 (talk) 00:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

@Eric0892: I would be happy to, but I generally prefer to wait until the final results so that you only have to do the numbers once :) Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2020

(UTC)

Ah, okay. Thanks! Eric0892 (talk) 00:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

WP:IAR

Hi Jon. I find it confusing that you reverted my edit to Ariana Grande stating "WP:IAR - that’s silly".

First, MOS:THEMUSIC states that any artist who's stage name starts with "The" should be treated as sentence case. A list is like a bullet sentence, so "The Weeknd" should be in lowercase.

Second, ignoring that rule is like ignoring MOS:CAPS or MOS:NUMERAL. It’s not helpful at all. Consensus was reached that all titles should be in title case or that all numbers between zero and nine should be spelled out. Just like how consensus was reached to have "the" be treated like it would in any other part of the English language. So I don’t think it was a good idea to ignore consensus just because "it was stopping you from editing Wikipedia".

Could you please explain why you reverted my edit? Could you also please explain how WP:IAR is helpful to Wikipedia? I’m a little confused, especially since someone’s definition of "improving Wikipedia" might be ignoring WP:NOR or WP:V. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 17:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

@Doggy54321: If you could find 2-3 reliable sources that use the capitalization "the Weeknd" I would gladly reconsider. Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
There is already a consensus made at the BLP notice board: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive315#Capitalization of "the" in a stage name. Please read over that (also see Talk:The Weeknd#RfC - capitalization of The Weeknd's stage name). D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 21:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Jon Kolbert,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Stephen!!

I still know it's you, Stephen Colbert!! From my family to yours, Merry Christmas, Kolbert!! --TheSandDoctor Talk 16:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Jon Kolbert: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, TheSandDoctor Talk 16:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Happy New Year!


Walter Elmer Schofield, Across the River (1904), Carnegie Museum of Art. 		Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2021.
Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place.
BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:19, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Oneupsmanship: This painting turned the friendly rivalry between Edward Redfield and Elmer Schofield into
a feud. Schofield was a frequent houseguest at Redfield's farm, upstream from New Hope, Pennsylvania,
and the two would go out painting together, competing to capture the better view. Redfield served on the jury
for the 1904 Annual Exhibition of the Carnegie Institute; at which, despite Redfield's opposition, Across the
River was awarded the Gold Medal and $1,500 prize. It was not until a 1963 interview that the 93-year-old
Redfield revealed the painting as the cause of the 40-year feud between them. Schofield may have painted it
in England, but a blindsided Redfield knew that it was a view of the Delaware River, from his own front yard!

Talk pages for 2020 BC Election Templates

Hello Jon, all 87 templates for the BC Election has been made. Would you please use the Auto Wiki Browser and create the Template Talk pages? I couldn't figure out how to create talk pages with AWB. Thank you! — Eric0892 (talk) 05:18, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@Eric0892: Done, and I would be happy to show you how to do it for the future :) Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, Jon Kolbert! — Eric0892 (talk) 00:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

from irc

<sDrewth> afterhours, enwiki is not part of global abusefilters
<sDrewth> afterhours, it is w:en:AF/935 and I have just updated to our current version. Noting that the filter has been designed as English is not native language on most of the global wikis, so the English language NTSAMR is a good target

— billinghurst sDrewth 05:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Granville Island Brewing

I was wondering if you could update the logo on the GIB page, you were the one who uploaded the old logo but I have no idea how to get around all the copyright/info needed to change it. --MattBinYYC (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

@MattBinYYC: done :) Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Range block

Hi, I am using an internet connection from my mobile phone logged into this account (TSventon). I received the following message earlier today

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by Jon Kolbert (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is Long-term abuse. Start of block: 15:32, 21 March 2021 Expiry of block: 15:32, 21 June 2021 Your current IP address is REDACTED and the blocked range is 92.40.187.128/25. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki or send an email to the stewards OTRS queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

I am curious what the point of this kind of block is as all I had to do was restart my phone to change my IP address. Are some of the addresses in the range fixed? TSventon (talk) 13:01, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Second opinion on barnstar design

Hey, Jon! I was wondering if I could get your opinion on this: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards#Alteration to Third Opinion Barnstar ? Thanks! – Reidgreg (talk) 20:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Block

Hi Jon! I seems like you blocked me from editing Wikipedia. Can you please tell me why? Carmen Valdés (talk) 00:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Correctable of Azo of Iberia

The article reads (Modern interpretation): Moses speaks of "Mithridates, satrap of Darius" (identifiable with Mithridates I of Pontus) installed by Alexander to rule over the Georgians. Darius died in 330 BC, and Mithridates I of Pontus was not born at that time ... Mithridates II of Cius should be written here, because during his transfer (302 BC) the Kingdom of Iberia was formed. Correction is necessary here. Thanks in advance.--Lasha-george (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Jon Kolbert,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/KolbertBot 4

Hello, any way you can re-run your script? Special:Search/insource:/feature=youtu/ has over 2000 search results. Thanks, ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:57, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oxford International School, Dhaka logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oxford International School, Dhaka logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

iCloud Private Relay

Hello! I was told you might be interested in this thread in the Village Pump. It's about Apple's iCloud Relay, a new service similar to open proxy. We (folks at the Wikimedia Foundation doing the pulse-check on this) will be grateful for your opinions on a centralized talk page on Meta-Wiki. Thank you! SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 21:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive
  • On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 01:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Unblock?

Are you related to the global blocks on Wikimedia? I can't do anything to edit there or on Commons. I can't even figure out how to request an unblock. —GoldRingChip 20:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@GoldRingChip: Can you send information about your block to me in an e-mail? You seem to be able to edit here? I can take a look once I know what block is affecting you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas, Ste -- err -- Jon!

Morning, Jon! I hope that you have a very Merry Christmas. Do say 'hi' sometime when you're on air sometime? From my family to yours, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Hello Jon Kolbert: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, TheSandDoctor Talk 04:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

File:Baindur Railway Station (cropped).jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing information on its image description page, which would help other contributors make make better use of the image, and make that page more informative to readers.

If possible, please add this information, otherwise the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided. Please also consider updating other files you created or uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you.

--Lewis Cawte (Talk) 17:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ontario New Democrats logo.svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ontario New Democrats logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Precious
Four years!

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy Christmas!

Hello Jon Kolbert: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, TheSandDoctor Talk 18:09, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

From my family to yours: Merry Christmas! I know it's really you, Colbert...break a leg! TheSandDoctor Talk 18:09, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

"United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, 1796" and "United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, 1820" listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirects United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, 1796 and United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, 1820 and has thus listed both for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 18 § United States Senate election in Pennsylvania, 1793 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Super Goku V (talk) 08:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of The Daily Campus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Daily Campus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Campus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chances last a finite time (talk) 14:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cryptic Fate - Srestho cover.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cryptic Fate - Srestho cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Template:Infobox drug/sandbox - add indicator if there's a black box warning.

Hi! I see you're working on Template:Infobox drug/sandbox to import from wikidata. I'm looking to get started on that too. (I'd be starting from scratch.) I want to add an indicator for each drug page if there's an FDA black box warning about it. I'm wondering if you'd be up for helping out, e.g. with template edits/coordinating/cooperating with me. I'm also wanting to have the infobox import more data from wikidata that I'm in the process of adding. I've made edits like this. I intend to do a lot of edits like that, importing from a comprehensive data source at FDA downloadable from https://nctr-crs.fda.gov/fdalabel/ui/spl-summaries/criteria/343802 (query: https://nctr-crs.fda.gov/fdalabel/ui/#/search/spl-summaries/criteria/343802) at the The FDALabel Database. RudolfoMD (talk) 04:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jon_Kolbert/Archive_5&oldid=1252977742"